Filed Under:  Environmental, Gulf Coast, Local, News

Study finds FDA underestimated health risks of Gulf seafood after BP disaster

24th October 2011   ·   0 Comments

By Sue Sturgis
Contributing Writer

(Special from Facing South) — The concerns were often heard in Gulf Coast communities in the months after the BP oil disaster began unfolding last April: The federal Food & Drug Administration (FDA) was setting acceptable levels of seafood consumption that failed to adequately protect women and children from contaminants, and that did not account for the large amount of seafood that the region’s residents eat.

A new study has found that those concerns were justified.

Research carried out by scientists affiliated with the Natural Re­sources Defense Council (NRDC) and published online this month in the peer-reviewed journal Environ­mental Health Perspec­tives found that the FDA seriously underestimated the health risks from contaminants in Gulf seafood following the BP disaster. The NRDC researchers focused on a group of chemicals called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are found in crude oil and have been linked to cancer and birth defects.

“We were surprised by how far off FDA’s numbers really were,” study co-author Miriam Rotkin-Ellman wrote on her blog. “FDA accepted 100 to 10,000 times more PAH contamination of seafood than our calculations deemed safe.”

The FDA established its acceptable levels of contaminants based on the effects PAHs would have on a person weighing 176 pounds — far more than children and many women weigh. Its calculations also used the average national seafood consumption rates, even though residents of the Gulf region eat as much as five times the national average. At the same time, the FDA did not consider the special harm that PAHs can do to young children and developing fetuses, and it ignored the cancer risk from the PAH naphthalene, a major contaminant in oil.

Rotkin-Ellman reports, for example, the FDA said that 123,000 micrograms of naphthalene per kilogram of shrimp was safe for everyone to eat. Ac­cording to our calculations, only 5.91 micrograms should have been allowed to protect pregnant women and children who eat a lot of seafood. For comparison, our calculations show that 46.99 mi­crograms of naphthalene per kilogram of shellfish would be safe for an adult consumer.

The FDA has repeatedly claimed that there are no health risks from eating Gulf seafood, but the NRDC scientists found that claim was inaccurate. In fact, up to 53 percent of shrimp tested had PAH levels exceeding the scientists’ revised levels of concern for pregnant women who are heavy consumers of Gulf shellfish. That means that if 1,000 pregnant women ate Gulf seafood with contamination levels that FDA claimed were safe, 20 of the children they bore would be at significant risk of cancer.

The NRDC scientists also discovered through documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests that the Environ­mental Protection Agency — and even some FDA staff — proposed stronger health protections but were ignored.

Following the study’s release, the NRDC submitted a citizen petition to the FDA asking it to recognize the hazards posed by PAHs in seafood and to set more protective safety standards.

This article was originally published in the October 24, 2011 print edition of The Louisiana Weekly newspaper

Readers Comments (0)

You must be logged in to post a comment.